PortfoliosLab logo
HCI vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HCI and ^GSPC is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

HCI vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HCI:

1.60

^GSPC:

0.57

Sortino Ratio

HCI:

1.77

^GSPC:

0.97

Omega Ratio

HCI:

1.26

^GSPC:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

HCI:

1.55

^GSPC:

0.62

Martin Ratio

HCI:

4.46

^GSPC:

2.38

Ulcer Index

HCI:

11.67%

^GSPC:

4.93%

Daily Std Dev

HCI:

40.05%

^GSPC:

19.55%

Max Drawdown

HCI:

-78.79%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

HCI:

0.00%

^GSPC:

-5.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCI achieves a 43.91% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, HCI has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 17.46%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.61% annualized return.


HCI

YTD

43.91%

1M

14.04%

6M

41.77%

1Y

63.48%

5Y*

35.75%

10Y*

17.46%

^GSPC

YTD

-1.44%

1M

8.08%

6M

-3.32%

1Y

10.99%

5Y*

15.15%

10Y*

10.61%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HCI vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HCI is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HCI is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HCI is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HCI is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HCI is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HCI is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HCI vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCI and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

HCI vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCI drawdown since its inception was -78.79%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCI and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HCI vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) has a higher volatility of 10.36% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 5.97%. This indicates that HCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...